<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mpora Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/</link>
	<description>Sports Business, Social Networking and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:51:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-5911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/#comment-5911</guid>
		<description>Site design is definitely a lot better.  Maybe a little bit TOO &quot;web 2.0ish&quot; but it is nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site design is definitely a lot better.  Maybe a little bit TOO &#8220;web 2.0ish&#8221; but it is nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-5910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/#comment-5910</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting. When I compare compete #s to google analytics (for this site), the numbers aren&#039;t that far off from each other --not exactly perfect, but not off 6 to 1. I guess it just varies from site to site...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting. When I compare compete #s to google analytics (for this site), the numbers aren&#8217;t that far off from each other &#8211;not exactly perfect, but not off 6 to 1. I guess it just varies from site to site&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe M.</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-5907</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/#comment-5907</guid>
		<description>Compete numbers are usually not very accurate.  They can be off by as much as 6 to 1.  They are actually better for comparing sites and looking at growth curves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compete numbers are usually not very accurate.  They can be off by as much as 6 to 1.  They are actually better for comparing sites and looking at growth curves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-5893</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonfpeck.com/2008/04/10/mpora-redesign/#comment-5893</guid>
		<description>thanks for the mention,  Competes figures are way off as they probably just show US traffic but even then...

Cheers from Mpora.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the mention,  Competes figures are way off as they probably just show US traffic but even then&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers from Mpora.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
